[FEL-L] India - How to Kill the Tiger

[BigCatSimba at aol.com]

Sunday, Jul. 30, 2006
How to Kill the Tiger 
Ruthless poachers and lame preservation efforts threaten India's big cats 
with extinction 
BY BENJAMIN SIEGEL | NEW DELHI 
One of the difficulties with killing tigers is that they scream. Snaring them 
is simple enough, says Nitin Desai, a conservationist at the Wildlife 
Protection Society of India—you set a few iron traps near a game-park watering 
hole, then wait for a tiger to take a wrong step. But when the trap's jagged 
metal teeth sink into its paw, the tiger howls—an alarm that can rouse a sleepy 
park ranger. So, a smart poacher will plunge a spear down the trapped 
animal's throat and tear out its vocal chords; then, at his leisure, he can poison or 
electrocute the cat—or, if the buyer doesn't mind a bullet hole in the 
pelt, simply shoot it. 
It may be far harder, in fact, to catch a poacher than a tiger. Typically, 
says Desai, who has spent a decade chasing poachers and pelt dealers across the 
central Indian state of Maharashtra, the hunt begins with a tip-off from 
informants or rival dealers. Then you arrange a pelt showing. When the dealer 
unfurls his roll of pelts, you sniff each skin to check its quality. After that, 
you arrange the buy—in the midst of which the police pounce, arresting the 
dealer. This hunt can take months, only to be followed by the legal battle, 
which can take years. "It's not just about nabbing and nailing them in the act," 
says Desai. 
Though India remains the world's last significant sanctuary for wild tigers, 
the numbers there are dwindling fast. The country's wild tiger population has 
dropped from about 100,000 in the 19th century to as few as 1,200 to 1,800 
today. In another five years this feline population could plunge to a level—
around 500 cats—where in many parts of India it would no longer be able to 
sustain itself. At that point, they would survive almost exclusively in zoolike 
safari parks. "India is letting the tiger slip through its fingers," says 
Belinda Wright, director of the Wildlife Protection Society of India. "It's going 
to be one of the biggest conservation debacles the world has ever known." 
Globally, the tiger's future looks similarly bleak. A major study released last 
month by the Wildlife Conservation Society in New York, the World Wildlife Fund 
and Washington's Smithsonian National Zoological Park reports that tigers now 
occupy an area 41% smaller than a decade ago. The report warns that, over the 
next 20 years, tigers are poised to "disappear in many places, or shrink to 
the point of 'ecological extinction.'" 
Poaching has always been a problem in India, but economic growth across the 
border has pushed hunters to new levels of greed. As the ranks of affluent 
Chinese increase, so does the demand for tiger skins, along with ground tiger 
bones, whiskers and penises for use in traditional Chinese medicine. A large, 
unblemished pelt can fetch over $10,000, and powdered tiger bones sell for 
hundreds of dollars per kilogram. Neighboring Tibet has become a virtual shopping 
mall for tigers. In an undercover visit in 2005, conservationist Wright filmed 
vendors in Lhasa hawking dozens of pelts and swatches in the back rooms of 
stores and on street corners—an exposé that led the Dalai Lama to condemn the 
trade. 
Chinese demand may be driving the poaching boom, but conservationists blame 
New Delhi for failing to protect the tigers. Wright reserves particular ire for 
the government's 30-year-old showcase conservation effort, Project Tiger, 
which is widely regarded as understaffed and underfunded. "The government hasn't 
recruited any new forest staff in 15 years," she says. Remarks Valmik Thapar, 
one of India's foremost tiger experts and the director of a conservation group 
called the Ranthambhore Foundation: "The government just doesn't have the 
will to save the tiger." 
That message may, at least, have gotten through to Prime Minister Manmohan 
Singh, who acknowledged last year that India needed "a more effective strategy 
for tackling poaching and smuggling." In April 2005 he convened a Tiger Task 
Force, headed by Sunita Narian, one of India's most-admired environmentalists. 
The Task Force recommended streamlining government agencies and establishing a 
well-funded wildlife-crime bureau that would take the burden of protection 
away from organizations like the Wildlife Protection Society of India. But P.K. 
Sen, head of the World Wildlife Fund's India Tiger Conservation Program and a 
former director of Project Tiger, says the Task Force was a disappointment from 
the start. "There was nothing new in the tiger action plan," he claims. "The 
Task Force members only looked at the best parks in the country, and never 
even went to the worst ones." 
A year has passed since the Task Force issued its recommendations, and 
there's scant evidence of progress. The wildlife-crime bureau is still just a 
promising idea, and the government agencies in charge of conservation remain as 
ineffective as ever. Some wildlife experts argue that the Task Force may even be 
making the crisis worse. In its recommendations, it tries hard to balance 
concern for the animals with promoting the rights of poor farmers and tribal groups 
who share their land. "There are villages inside core tiger-reserve areas 
with no food, no education," says Narain. "While we need to arm guards and build 
fences, we also need to find ways to improve the lives of tribals and other 
poor people." But any gain for people can be a loss for the tiger, and 
conservationists argue that the tribal communities sometimes assist poaching. "Every 
tiger that walks into the forest is a cash register," says Wright. "He 
represents years of funds for every poor person that lives near his habitat." A bill up 
for debate in parliament this month would allow tribal communities expanded 
land and building rights in wildlife reserves, which threatens to crowd tigers 
off their few remaining sanctuaries. "If they recognize the tribal-rights 
bill," says Thapar, "the wildlife-protection act and the forest-conservation act 
will just collapse." 
Meanwhile, every month that India spends debating the tiger's future, that 
future grows grimmer. As many as 250 tigers are slaughtered by Indian poachers 
each year, according to Wright, and as populations fall, poachers chase the 
animals deeper into the reserves. Nowhere is safe. In the Vidarbha region, which 
includes the Tadoba-Andhari Tiger Reserve, a sanctuary where the tiger 
population had expanded healthily for a quarter of a century, 12 tigers have died in 
the past 18 months. Some conservationists suspect that other tiger reserves 
have already been virtually emptied of their inhabitants. 
Desai, the poacher hunter, despairs for the animals he lives to protect. 
Despite his efforts, he laments, "There's an unbelievable quantity of skins on the 
market." Indeed, as India revels in its emergence as a global economic power, 
conservationists wonder if the unique wildlife that once owned the land is 
simply being left behind, shed like an old skin. "I think India has to ask 
itself if it really wants the tiger," says Wright. "Because the signs are it 
doesn't." 
http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/printout/0,13675,501060807-1220445,00.h
tml
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.breuckman.com/pipermail/felines-l/attachments/20060809/e2373d6b/attachment-0001.html